On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 11:56:13 GMT, Phillipe <pfilm@yahoo.com> wrote:

>This should be labeled "Technical Issues and Definitions FAQ"; it's
>excellent for what it covers, it says nada, zilch nothing about other
>issues, :
>
>Walkie talkies
>
>Drop Outs
>
>Dead Zones
>
>Building Penetration
>
>Roaming
>
>Reception/Antennas
>
>Coverage Maps
>
>Capacity Issues
>
>Weather Effects
>
>Sources of Interference
>
>Batteries
>
>Sales Practices
>
>Billing Practices
>
>etc, etc, etc
>
>
>Many of the issues discusses or defined are transparent to end user
>customers. Many of the above issues are not. I belive the above issues
>can be discussed without playing favorites one carrier vs another.

Well, if you know where all this information can be put together why
don't you take the initiative and have a stab at it?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To send an email reply send to
GSMthemobilestandard (@) yahoo.com