![]() |
![]() |
||
|
|
|||
| |
|||
|
|||
|
I'm interested in opinions on which carriers are going to gain customers and
which will lose customers when portability goes into effect. For me, I'm gonna switch from ATTWS to T-Mobile. -- To reply by email send to gweischadle (@) sattel.com |
|
|||
|
In article <jpdsb.7530$nz.6746@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.n et>,
"George Weischadle" <look@signature_to.reply> wrote: > I'm interested in opinions on which carriers are going to gain customers and > which will lose customers when portability goes into effect. For me, I'm > gonna switch from ATTWS to T-Mobile. The betting is the companies with best coverage and customer service and lowest churn currently will be winners: i.e. Verizon & Nextel Losers could be SprintPCS, TMobile, Alltell, other local companies could win or lose Cinglular, AT&T ============= This is based on what I've read in business news the last 2 months. Could be totally wrong, or spot-on or anything in between. |
|
|||
|
George,
An author I respect, Scott Moritz, a Tech writer at theStreet.com proposes the two biggest winners will be Verizon and T-Mobile. (link to the site no longer works) Verizon, because they are PERCEIVED as having the Best coverage, and T-Mobile because they are PERCEIVED as having the best-priced service (as in 'cheapest'). I capitalize 'perceived' because it doesn't matter what the facts are, the American consumer will decide based on what they perceive to be reality, not reality itself. Unfortunately, these perceptions are based on what marketing has accomplished. How do people perceive each carrier based on their recent marketing? Verizon: "Can you hear me now" =Coverage everywhere. Sprint PCS; "Clear alternative to cellular" =Doesn't have static Nextel: "It's how work gets done." =Work phone T-Mobile: "Get More" =More minutes for your money AT&T: "mMode" =Fancy features Cingular: "What do you have to say" =Audible connections -Bill Radio Western U.S. Wireless Reviews at: http://www.MountainWireless.com "George Weischadle" <look@signature_to.reply> wrote in message news:jpdsb.7530$nz.6746@newsread2.news.pas.earthli nk.net... > I'm interested in opinions on which carriers are going to gain customers and > which will lose customers when portability goes into effect. For me, I'm > gonna switch from ATTWS to T-Mobile. |
|
|||
|
Bill Radio wrote: > George, > An author I respect, Scott Moritz, a Tech writer at theStreet.com proposes > the two biggest winners will be Verizon and T-Mobile. (link to the site no > longer works) Verizon, because they are PERCEIVED as having the Best > coverage, and T-Mobile because they are PERCEIVED as having the best-priced > service (as in 'cheapest'). > > I capitalize 'perceived' because it doesn't matter what the facts are, the > American consumer will decide based on what they perceive to be reality, not > reality itself. Unfortunately, these perceptions are based on what > marketing has accomplished. How do people perceive each carrier based on > their recent marketing? > Verizon: "Can you hear me now" =Coverage everywhere. > Sprint PCS; "Clear alternative to cellular" =Doesn't have static > Nextel: "It's how work gets done." =Work phone > T-Mobile: "Get More" =More minutes for your money > AT&T: "mMode" =Fancy features > Cingular: "What do you have to say" =Audible connections It is so sad that you 100% correct But i think AT&T locally is the service doing the most advertise to customer looking to take there numbers to another provider. They are the only service i have seen advertise about taking number thats only in new york after DEC 1. Whoever comes up with the best ad about changing service will be a winner -- Must fight it must , i must fight my A.D.D , what was i talking about oh never mind oooo what that over there |
|
|||
|
"Bill Radio" <Bill@MountainWirelessNOSPAM.com> wrote in message news:<vr6bqff7d1dc28@corp.supernews.com>...
> Verizon: "Can you hear me now" =Coverage everywhere. > Sprint PCS; "Clear alternative to cellular" =Doesn't have static > Nextel: "It's how work gets done." =Work phone > T-Mobile: "Get More" =More minutes for your money > AT&T: "mMode" =Fancy features > Cingular: "What do you have to say" =Audible connections ....Qwest: "We're still in the wireless business. Really." |
|
|||
|
"Bill Radio" <Bill@MountainWirelessNOSPAM.com> wrote in message news:<vr6bqff7d1dc28@corp.supernews.com>...
> Cingular: "What do you have to say" =Audible connections Gosh, I haven't heard that one in ages. Do they even run Cingular ads in CO? If not, how would you know? Cingular's slogan has been "Cingular fits you best." here in TX for a while now, promoting mostly their 7 pm nights and weekends, the $10/line FamilyTalk, and some of the new GSM features. |
|
|||
|
Todd Allcock wrote: > "Bill Radio" <Bill@MountainWirelessNOSPAM.com> wrote in message news:<vr6bqff7d1dc28@corp.supernews.com>... > > >>Verizon: "Can you hear me now" =Coverage everywhere. >>Sprint PCS; "Clear alternative to cellular" =Doesn't have static >>Nextel: "It's how work gets done." =Work phone >>T-Mobile: "Get More" =More minutes for your money >>AT&T: "mMode" =Fancy features >>Cingular: "What do you have to say" =Audible connections > > > ...Qwest: "We're still in the wireless business. Really." Qwest. Monopoly. Terrible. Now I remember why I don't have a landline. AD |
|
|||
|
X,
I thought long a hard about these marketing phrases. I had to think what message was most heavily promoted. Before the current Cingular campaign, the phrase that stuck was "Rollover". What does that say? But it was actually too short-lived to "sink in". Their current campaign is too new. That's part of their problem, changing their image every few months. As stupid as it seems, Sprint hanging on to "Free & Clear" (or "The Clear Alternative to Cellular") long after its applicability, has had the effect that people remember it and associate it with Sprint PCS. We see many Cingular ads on nationally-broadcast programs, especially sports. Yes, we are at least 500 miles from Cingular coverage (Amarillo?). But I will give all due respect for the nation's 2nd larger carrier, even though they don't exist anywhere near here. But in marketing, perception is reality. What, honestly, is your image of Cingular? -Bill "XFF" <xff@austin.rr.com> wrote in message news:298d9cbf.0311131034.2bd31894@posting.google.c om... > "Bill Radio" <Bill@MountainWirelessNOSPAM.com> wrote in message news:<vr6bqff7d1dc28@corp.supernews.com>... > > > Cingular: "What do you have to say" =Audible connections > > Gosh, I haven't heard that one in ages. Do they even run Cingular ads > in CO? If not, how would you know? Cingular's slogan has been > "Cingular fits you best." here in TX for a while now, promoting mostly > their 7 pm nights and weekends, the $10/line FamilyTalk, and some of > the new GSM features. |
|
|||
|
"Bill Radio" <Bill@MountainWirelessNOSPAM.com> wrote in message news:<vr8tqfpgt8430@corp.supernews.com>...
> X, > I thought long a hard about these marketing phrases. I had to think what > message was most heavily promoted. Before the current Cingular campaign, > the phrase that stuck was "Rollover". What does that say? But it was > actually too short-lived to "sink in". Their current campaign is too new. > That's part of their problem, changing their image every few months. As > stupid as it seems, Sprint hanging on to "Free & Clear" (or "The Clear > Alternative to Cellular") long after its applicability, has had the effect > that people remember it and associate it with Sprint PCS. Ooops, I forgot about Rollover. That's probably the #1 feature Cingular's promoting right now, ahead of 7 pm nights & weekends, $10 FamilyTalk, and GSM. > We see many Cingular ads on nationally-broadcast programs, especially > sports. Yes, we are at least 500 miles from Cingular coverage (Amarillo?). Indeed, Amarillo, TX would be the closest native Cingular market (358 miles) from Denver, CO. Number two closest market would be Wichita Falls, KS (435 miles). If you get with Larry he might be able to suggest a 50 ft beam antenna that let's you pull in the Amarillo system :-) > But in marketing, perception is reality. What, honestly, is your image of > Cingular? Well, speaking purely from personal experience I like Cingular a lot. They're the coverage king in central, east, and south Texas and on the Preferred Nation plan they give us Western Wireless and Centennial Wireless for free to fill in the gaps (http://people.ku.edu/~cinema/wireless/southwest.html). On the local plans you can also get Concho Cellular, Dobson Cellular, and ATTWS for free, so you're truly 100% covered across the entire state. From a local coverage point of view you just can't beat Cingular around here. Aside from coverage (which to me is the most important aspect of choosing a wireless carrier), Cingular has great plans, especially with Rollover and 7 pm nights and weekends. Furthermore, they allowed me to activate my own handset, and since I didn't take a promotional handset they allowed me to sign up without contract. So I really don't have anything bad to to say about Cingular, again from my personal point of view. I realize the the west coast with Cingular's GSM PCS system is a whole different story. I'd be hard pressed to recommend Cingular out there. Granted, the new GSM plans are much less attractive to me due to reduced roaming (and therefore overall) coverage. The GAIT plans give you fantastic coverage, but a lousy choice of handsets. If only there was at least a GSM/AMPS handset! Oh well... Until the country is 100% digital and there are GSM/CDMA dual-mode handsets available I won't be giving up on AMPS quite yet. |
| |
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:23 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 |