On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 17:40:13 +0100, "Grant Mason" <news@mason.sh>
wrote:

>"Toby Newman" <google@asktoby.com> wrote in message
>news:25a29397.0307030320.31e369ee@posting.google. com
>> Hi
>>
>> I have a Nokia 3310e, and find it's size and weight cumbersome. What
>> is the smallest, lightest mobile phone available today?
>
>The Panasonic GD55 is amazingly small - I saw one in a shop last week and
>pictures on the web don't do it justice.
>
>A co-worker has a Siemens CL50 and that's a tiny little thing as well.
>
>GD55 - 77mm x 43 x 17 65g 51cc
>CL50 - 73mm x 39 x 22 73g 59cc
>
>As a comparison:
>
>3310 - 113mm x 48 x 22 133g 97cc

Can I enter a bid for the SE T66 please. Probably not *quite* as
small as that Panasonic, buy pretty tiny!

In article <scbbgvke7h3lvl4cr746c4m92oamgjd3cs@4ax.com>,
Richie <richard_munro@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 17:40:13 +0100, "Grant Mason" <news@mason.sh>
> wrote:

> >"Toby Newman" <google@asktoby.com> wrote in message
> >news:25a29397.0307030320.31e369ee@posting.google. com
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I have a Nokia 3310e, and find it's size and weight cumbersome. What
> >> is the smallest, lightest mobile phone available today?
> >
> >The Panasonic GD55 is amazingly small - I saw one in a shop last week and
> >pictures on the web don't do it justice.
> >
> >A co-worker has a Siemens CL50 and that's a tiny little thing as well.
> >
> >GD55 - 77mm x 43 x 17 65g 51cc
> >CL50 - 73mm x 39 x 22 73g 59cc
> >
> >As a comparison:
> >
> >3310 - 113mm x 48 x 22 133g 97cc

> Can I enter a bid for the SE T66 please. Probably not *quite* as
> small as that Panasonic, buy pretty tiny!

Also don't forget the SE T600, the follow-up to the T66.

--
Ryan Li - replace no.spam with vzero.com to email

Weird Things In Video Games [ http://weird.vzero.com/ ]
Visual Experience: Digital Photography [ http://ve.vzero.com/ ]