voiptalker@gmail.com schreef:
> On 20 Dec, 18:50, TheFug <n...@mplea.ze> wrote:
>
>> Yes, and it's the great thing of Usenet, to share one's experience, i
>> understand "Flash" points out that it's fast, not that a thumb memory
>> stick is used, and that it's based on a CentOS Linux distro
>
> Forgive me Fug if I misunderstand you, but I think maybe English is
> not your first language.

Correct, i'm living in the Netherlands

> The name PBX-in-a-flash could have a couple
> of meanings - 1) PBX in a flash (usb memory stick drive or flash card
> maybe)
so even you aren't sure...

> or 2) as in the expression "in a flash" meaning in an instant,
> rather than performing quickly - i.e. quick to setup. As a side note I
> had tried a virtual Trixbox running on a Compact Flash card on a
> Windows machine which worked, but not too well under a load of 2 or
> more calls at once......
>
yeah, that's why i asked it, but from your answer, i guess it means the
both of them....are meant, by Flash: fast,(as in speed) and USB/CF
memory, i guess because there are also small mobo's (and thin servers)
that use only CompactFlash as storage...

>> , i'm also
>> interested in setting up a PBX server, to connect my normal POTS phone
>> to, Internet,(VoIP/SIP) and my incomming POTS landline,
>> What's better to use, i now have a SPA3102 ATA, also have a grandstream
>> GXP2000 now...or is a Digium PCI card, a better solution ? ( i want to
>> be able to receive normal landline calls too) for phoning mostly by
>> VoIP/SIP ?
>
> Any asterisk distribution will handle what you want to do. If you
> don't want to get your hands too dirty, any of the distributions with
> a GUI like FreePBX (trixbox, PBX-in-a-flash, elastix, centPBX etc)
> makes setting up a working PBX very simple for untechy people like
> myself. Even for techy people they can save a lot of time getting
> things to work. Of course, as Gordon suggests abovr, you could install
> FreePBX after installing asterisk.
>
Thankyou for these tips...

> The choice between a SPA3102 and a Digum card is down to you. The
> Spa3012 is cheaper and does the job well. It's also probably easier to
> set up to work reliably (some may disagree).

Thankyou, that saves a lot, because i allready have the spa3102...
I only thought the Asterisk software was more dedicated to the Digium
card, instead of the SPA3102, but i guess the SPA is also very populair,
lucky me..


--
The Fug.