![]() |
![]() |
||
|
|
|||
| |
|||
|
|||
|
I wondered why emails from my Mum were getting junked by Outlook - turns out
Sky's move to Google Mail hasn't just resulted in a change to their POP3/SMTP settings. When you send email via smtp.tools.sky.com, they now strip the email address portion of the From: line and replace it with the relevant @sky.com email address. I'm frankly amazed that Sky/Google are willing to modify STMP headers without making it explicit to the end user. Via their Control Panel they do offer the option of setting up multiple email addresses which at least ensures the From: line is unmolested but they stil insist on inserting a "Sender:" and "Return-path:" into the SMTP envelope based upon the Sky account holder. For households that have users sending emails from multiple accounts/devices, it means their sent messages look particularly ugly when they arrive in an Outlook inbox: "Dad Bloggs [j.bloggs@sky.com] on behalf of Mum Bloggs [mum@something.else]" I can see myself recommending that Mum, Dad, sister, in-laws etc. all shell out ten quid a year on a Clara account just to get access to their SMTP server. |
|
|||
|
On 12/02/2008 in message <1202828369.87515.0@iris.uk.clara.net> Grant wrote:
>When you send email via smtp.tools.sky.com, they now strip the email >address portion of the From: line and replace it with the relevant >@sky.com email address. > >I'm frankly amazed that Sky/Google are willing to modify STMP headers >without making it explicit to the end user. So if you want to use an email address from a domain you own, say me@mydomain.co.uk, you are stuffed??? -- Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK 640k ought to be enough for anyone. (Bill Gates, 1981) |
|
|||
|
Jeff Gaines wrote:
> > So if you want to use an email address from a domain you own, say > me@mydomain.co.uk, you are stuffed??? Almost. If you jump through some configuration hoops, you can send email with the followng headers: From: me@mydomain.co.uk Return-Path: account.name@sky.com Sender: account.name@sky.com The latter two are injected by Sky and apparently not optional. They cause certain mail clients to display "From <sender> sent on behalf of <from>". |
|
|||
|
On 12/02/2008 in message <1202844519.91154.0@iris.uk.clara.net> Grant wrote:
>Jeff Gaines wrote: >> >>So if you want to use an email address from a domain you own, say >>me@mydomain.co.uk, you are stuffed??? > >Almost. [snipped] OK, I wasn't considering Sky and certainly won't now! This is going to become a real issue as more and more people set up their own domains. -- Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK The facts, although interesting, are irrelevant |
|
|||
|
"Jeff Gaines" <jgaines_newsid@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:xn0fmcwlqlj3df002@news.individual.net... > On 12/02/2008 in message <1202844519.91154.0@iris.uk.clara.net> Grant > wrote: > >>Jeff Gaines wrote: >>> >>>So if you want to use an email address from a domain you own, say >>>me@mydomain.co.uk, you are stuffed??? >> >>Almost. > > [snipped] > > OK, I wasn't considering Sky and certainly won't now! This is going to > become a real issue as more and more people set up their own domains. Its not a problem, just don't use Sky's smtp server. |
|
|||
|
On 12/02/2008 in message <fosvkq$att$1@news.datemas.de> dennis@home wrote:
>Its not a problem, just don't use Sky's smtp server. OK - a follow up :-) I have 4 domains hosted, each with their own mail server, my own ISP is Demon. If I tell my email program (Barca 2) to connect to one of my own mail servers (but over my Demon connection) to send email how much of Demon's service am I using? I have been told that I will still be connected to Port 25 at Demon so any Sky-like (or AOL or BT like) restrictions they imposed would still apply. I don't have an issues at the moment, Demon don't apply restrictions, but it would be a key factor if I wanted to change ISP. -- Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK There is absolutely no substitute for a genuine lack of preparation |
|
|||
|
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 8:41 pm, in MID
<xn0fmcx8bmfs3k003@news.individual.net>, Jeff Gaines (jgaines_newsid@yahoo.co.uk) wrote: > On 12/02/2008 in message <fosvkq$att$1@news.datemas.de> dennis@home wrote: > >>Its not a problem, just don't use Sky's smtp server. > > OK - a follow up :-) > > I have 4 domains hosted, each with their own mail server, my own ISP is > Demon. > > If I tell my email program (Barca 2) to connect to one of my own mail > servers (but over my Demon connection) to send email how much of Demon's > service am I using? I have been told that I will still be connected to > Port 25 at Demon so any Sky-like (or AOL or BT like) restrictions they > imposed would still apply. What BT-like restrictions is that then ? -- Ian... |
|
|||
|
On 12/02/2008 in message <5_6dnQRp-pWFry_anZ2dnUVZ8tXinZ2d@bt.com> ian
wrote: >What BT-like restrictions is that then ? My understanding is if you use BT as your isp you can only send email from your BT (or BT/Yahoo) email address, they block other email with any other email address from going (as do AOL). You can currently get round it by switching from port 25 to another port. However, that didn't come from a technical group so any clarification would be good. -- Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK There are 10 types of people in the world, those who do binary and those who don't. |
|
|||
|
Jeff Gaines wrote:
> On 12/02/2008 in message <5_6dnQRp-pWFry_anZ2dnUVZ8tXinZ2d@bt.com> ian > wrote: > >> What BT-like restrictions is that then ? > > My understanding is if you use BT as your isp you can only send email > from your BT (or BT/Yahoo) email address, they block other email with > any other email address from going (as do AOL). You can currently get > round it by switching from port 25 to another port. > > However, that didn't come from a technical group so any clarification > would be good. > Is it a good thing or a bad thing? I tend to think it is a good thing - as the "from" address represents the account of the sender and usually matches the domain in the message ID :-) In addition, it seems that some organisations have spam filters that reject e-mails where the "reply to" address does not use the same domain as the "from" address (something I've used as a "family" e-mail filter) :-( -- PeeGee The reply address is a spam trap. All mail is reported as spam. "Nothing should be able to load itself onto a computer without the knowledge or consent of the computer user. Software should also be able to be removed from a computer easily." Peter Cullen, Microsoft Chief Privacy Strategist (Computing 18 Aug 05) |
|
|||
|
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Jeff Gaines wrote:-
>If I tell my email program (Barca 2) to connect to one of my own mail >servers (but over my Demon connection) to send email how much of >Demon's service am I using? That depends. Does your mail server send direct or does it relay through Demons servers? If it goes directly, it will use the wires and pass through Demons routers but it won't go through their servers, and no trace of any of Demons servers will appear in the mail headers. If it goes through Demons servers, there will be Received: headers in the mail showing which servers it passed through. E.g. post.demon.co.uk, followed by whichever one actually does the delivery. As an example, mail I send goes from my client, Turnpike, to my mail server, Sendmail. Sendmail will then look up where it's supposed to send the mail to and pass it on to the correct mail server. The only header containing a Demon address is the one generated by the receiving server saying that it received the mail from my server. The only exceptions to this is for AOL. A few (several?) years ago, AOL started accepting mail sent from IP addresses that were either an ISP or business mail server, or were on their whitelist. While my IP address was added to their whitelist, I had added an entry to my mailers list so any mail sent to AOL would go via Demons servers. Since then, the only person I was in contact with that had an AOL address has moved on, and I no longer need the forwarding rule, it's left there just in case. >I have been told that I will still be connected to Port 25 at Demon so >any Sky-like (or AOL or BT like) restrictions they imposed would still >apply. Only if your mail server is configured to forward mail to Demons servers. Regards, David Bolt -- Team Acorn: http://www.distributed.net/ OGR-P2 @ ~100Mnodes RC5-72 @ ~15Mkeys SUSE 10.1 32bit | openSUSE 10.2 32bit | openSUSE 10.3 32bit | openSUSE 11.0a1 SUSE 10.1 64bit | openSUSE 10.2 64bit | openSUSE 10.3 64bit RISC OS 3.6 | TOS 4.02 | openSUSE 10.3 PPC | RISC OS 3.11 |
| |
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:37 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 |